Pages

Thursday, August 23, 2012

August is Awesome Because of Terry W Ervin II

The last three weeks of August has been awesome, but the awesomeness continues with Terry.  One thing is for certain: Terry has an awesome supply of patience.  (You'll have to visit his website to find out why.)

Terry started his Up Around the Corner blog back in June of 2009 and has been going strong ever since.

There's depth to Terry's reservoir of insight when it comes to the craft of writing.  The post he so kindly provided today is a perfect example.  

Please give Terry an awesomely enthusiastic welcome!


Trust the Reader

One concern I have with writers who are working on their first novel is their lack of willingness to trust the reader. In my experience this mistrust manifests in three ways: Introductory prologues, controlling descriptions, and too many point of view characters.

My first point isn't that prologues are bad and should be avoided. Like every other literary technique or device, prologues have a proper use and place. However, when a writer justifies his historical prologue saying, "The readers need the cultural background and history to contextually understand what will happen later in the novel, and why," I am concerned. Or when a writer says, "If I don't introduce the readers to this event that's outside the main storyline, they won't understand what drives the characters, especially when they do ________," I think the writer is misjudging the cognitive ability of his readers.

If a writer isn't going to trust readers to pick up on clues provided through setting, plot events, character dialogue and actions all the way until something pivotal that happens on page 237, why would that same writer trust those same readers to remember a historical reference made on page 2 and apply it to an event on page 237?

The trick is to provide what readers need to know as the story progresses, and trust those readers to piece things together. Will every reader get it? Maybe not. But isn't it worth that, "Ahha" moment (or moments) when a reader pieces it together on his own? I believe the readers will think so.

My second concern is a writer that's too controlling of the reader in their descriptions. What I mean is a writer who describes a character all the way down to the number of gray whiskers in his stubbly beard. The writer wants the readers to see the characters exactly as the writer imagines them. Another example is a writer trying to describe a gruesome murder scene down to the exact angle or degree the rickety-handled, eight-inch, chipped, stainless steel, made in China meat cleaver hacks into the victim's shoulder as she (...) to how far, to the nearest quarter of an inch, the nineteen globular droplets of blood fly and land, and in what splatter pattern, after the cleaver is yanked out.

Maybe I'm exaggerating a bit--but not by much.

Trust the readers' imaginations. The writer should give his readers just enough description to stimulate their imagination. For example: As a female protagonist enters the classroom, she might note her assigned lab partner's piercing green eyes, a strong jaw, shoulders of a linebacker and his ratty, garage sale-rejected tweed jacket. Let the mind's eye of each reader fill in the rest. When they do, they'll better remember and relate to the characters. With the murder scene, the readers' imagination--what frightens them and how they envision it--will go farther than any series of words a writer might provide. Each reader will see, in their mind's eye, the cleaver and the blood splattering, if given enough to go on. Will each reader imagine the exact same thing? No. But it allows each reader to have some ownership of the story.

It's a delicate balance. How to get it right? A writer should read and study passages from his or her favorite authors. See how they did it, and why it worked. Then, modify what's learned to the individual writer's writing style and apply it to the current writing project.

My final concern is inserting too many POV characters into a novel. Sometimes multiple POV characters are necessary. But, if the reasons are so that readers can understand what's happening from a host of perspectives to get a well-rounded view, and readers needs to know the thoughts and motivations of every character important to the plot to understand actions taken, then the writer might consider rethinking his reasoning.

Trust the readers to pick up on character motivations and how that character views events compared to another character in the novel, without having to be explicitly shown. Consider that every reader--every human being--exists in a first person POV world. Most become adept at interpreting the thoughts and motivations of others, and looking at something from another's perspective without benefit of knowing their exact thoughts. So authors can count on readers to bring that ability to the table when reading a novel.

Yes, there are plenty of valid reasons to use omniscient POV or multiple third person limited POVs. I've read novels where there are a dozen or more POV characters. Harry Turtledove's World War Series would be an example. The reason to add POVs should not be a failure to reasonably trust that readers can figure out things like character motivation.

In the end, readers:
  • Actively engaged in a story, forming the characters, world and action in their mind's eye
  • Following characters and events, guessing and forming theories about why someone did something and what the other fellow might do next in response (and put it all together)...
will be satisfied readers.

Or, as a writer, that's how I see it.


About Terry W Ervin II:

Terry W. Ervin II is awesome!
Terry W. Ervin II is an English and science teacher who enjoys writing science fiction and fantasy. He is an editor for the speculative fiction magazine MindFlights and a guest contributor to Fiction Factor, an ezine for writers.

While Fiction Factor has published the majority of Terry's articles on writing, his short stories have appeared in over a dozen anthologies, magazines and ezines. The genres of his stories have ranged from science fiction and fantasy to horror and inspirational.

In late 2009 Gryphonwood Press published Terry's debut fantasy novel FLANK HAWK and recently released the second in the First Civilization's Legacy series, BLOOD SWORD.

To learn more about his writing endeavors or contact Terry, visit his:
Website: http://www.ervin-author.com/
Blog: Up Around the Corner
Unofficial Facebook Fan Page for the First Civilization's Legacy Series, Flankers

Flank Hawk Main Page, Book Trailer and Audiobook

Flank Hawk Sales Outlets:
AmazonUSA
Amazon UK
Barnes and Noble
Audible.com
iTunes
Smashwords

Blood Sword Sales Outlets:
AmazonUSA
Amazon UK
Barnesand Noble
Smashwords
Kobo

25 comments:

  1. Great post. Loved your comments on controlling description. It's so frustrating to have all forward plot motion stopped so they can detail every piece of trim on her skirt.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks, S.P. Bowers. Yes, too controlling makes for clumsy prose that can throw the reader off pace. Thanks for taking a moment to read and comment.

      Delete
  2. My publisher actually requested a prologue for my first book, but the second one didn't need it. (And doubt my third will either.) As for too much description or too many points of view - never going to happen! I like to keep it simple.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sometimes a prologue is right for a story, when it adds a slice of something to the story for the reader. Your writing sounds right up my reading alley.

      Delete
  3. In my first saga, I started with a single POV and ended with multiple. I was not aware at the time I did that. Didn't know what POV was either. Yet I noticed my readers ate the first 2 books and lost interest in the 3, precisely when the POV increased. Now I understand why and I am trying to write keeping only one.
    I'm also trying to balance the physical descriptions but...arghh, it's so tempting!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Dragon, it's a balancing act I believe all writers strive to get just right with every novel and short story. Maybe allow those descriptions their place in the first draft and trim them back where needed in revision?

      Delete
  4. Jeff,
    Thank you for the opportunity to post to your blog and be a part of August is Awesome!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You're quite welcome, Terry. Thanks for taking part and for such a great post!

      Delete
  5. Awesome post! You're so right. I think this is something that every greenie writer struggles with--and maybe the not-so-green ones too. You present it in such a logical, straight forward way. Thanks for the advice! :D

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Liesel,
      I appreciate your postive words and hope my suggestions assist you in reaching your writing goals.

      Delete
  6. It took me a long time to relinquish my hold on prologues. Not that I'm against them. Hopefully I don't err too much on the description end... Definitely things to watch out for!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Charlie,
      There isn't one single formula that works, but there are paths that seem move a work more toward a great read than others. One of our jobs as writers is to figure out those paths that work, even one including a prologue. Like you said, things to watch out for! :)

      Delete
  7. Sage advice, sir. I struggle with too much description myself; it's good to be reminded that the reader wants to participate in the conversation of the story, too.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You're right on target, Michael. A reader actively engaged is generally a happy reader. Thanks for taking the time to read and post.

      Delete
  8. This makes so much sense, Terry. Readers are smart and you have to trust them to understand and reach the conclusion without over-explanation. And you certainly don't want to slow down the story by adding unnecessary filler. Love your cover, BTW!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Gwen,
      Thanks, the artist (Christine Griffin) did an awesome job on the cover art.

      The trick is finding the right time to slow things down with what the reader needs to know, hopefully in context and without filler. Appreciate your reading and commenting.

      Delete
  9. Trying to find that right balance between giving readers too much or too little detail can be difficult - especially for new writers. I tend to over explain everything that happens. Not because I don't trust the reader, but because I don't trust my abilities yet.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Chemist Ken,
    If you can find a good reader or two, sometimes they can help you find that right balance.
    The best way to get it right is to read, study and write--and revise.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Ask Jeff if I use too much description. That was a giggle you didn't hear, by the way. Or maybe a chortle?

    This morning I got the following comment from a member of my writing group: "Obviously you want to assume your reader is intelligent and can figure things out by themselves, but I felt like I needed just a little bit more information."

    I err on the side of "too little," obviously.

    Lauren

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Lauren,
      Just goes to prove no two writers attack telling a story in the exact same way. It's neat that you recognize the concern, and have some supportive readers who won't hesitate to politely remind you.

      Quotes like the one you mentioned can help all of us writers re-evaluate our work.

      Delete
  12. Great post! Thank you for sharing :)


    New follower....

    http://demitrialunetta.blogspot.com

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Welcome, Demitria! We've had lots of great posts all month long by some awesome guests. Fantastic people they are, every last one.

      Delete
  13. As usual, Terry, you offered us excellent advice. It is always tempting to explain every detail in our stories, because we writers desperately want readers to enjoy the exact images in our minds. Ironically, trusting the reader also means allowing the reader to inject his or her own imagination into our creation, thus personalizing their experience. I believe it is that reader-supplied detail that helps readers to "connect" with a character or scene. Great advice...Dean

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Dean,
      Thanks for reading and taking a moment to comment. I agree with what you said about the reader injecting their own imagination. I do it all the time when I read, why wouldn't a writer expect his/her readers to do the same!

      Delete